A concept for Edra’s founding product designer: the gap between the process on paper and the process in practice, made visible, reviewable, and safe to hand to an agent.
Select a step on the map to see the evidence behind it and decide what the agent should do.
High-risk controls always keep a person in the loop. Everything else is yours to promote.
Enterprise AI fails when people cannot tell what the agent learned or why it acts. These are the bets behind this concept.
Process owners trust what they can check. The first screen compares the SOP with what the agent saw, instead of showing a confidence score they cannot verify.
Every step moves from observe to suggest to ask first to automatic, with an audit trail. Risk controls never go fully automatic, and the interface says why.
They know every exception and have never written them down. The product asks short questions with evidence beside them, and turns each answer into a rule.
Confidence always sits next to its evidence. Anything below 80% asks a person, and uses amber, never an alarm.
Sit with someone who runs this process daily and write down every exception they mention.
Run real cases through the agent and mark each place a person would disagree.
The first time someone fixes the agent tells me more than any survey.
One review step, in production, with the engineers, so we learn from real use.
I design and build, I am comfortable with open-ended problems, and I am based in New York, ready to work in person with the team.
Independent concept, not affiliated with Edra. The process, evidence, and numbers are simulated sample data.